<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Topics | Dong Liang</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/</link><atom:link href="https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Topics</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Film Aesthetics</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/film-aesthetics/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/film-aesthetics/</guid><description>&lt;p>Film aesthetics is the broadest entry point into the site’s cinema writing because it gathers the essays that ask how films work as organized experience rather than treating them mainly as stories or messages. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/filmstudies/">Everything You Want to Know About Film Studies&lt;/a> establishes that method most directly, while &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/framing/">Three Lessons on Cinematic Framing&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/staging/">A Crash Course on Cinematic Staging&lt;/a>, and &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/editing/">Cinematic Editing&lt;/a> show what that commitment looks like in practice.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Taken together, these pieces argue that interpretation gets stronger when it begins from form: framing, staging, movement, editing, sound, and the perceptual world they build together. The page is less a category label than a map of the site’s basic critical method.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Early Cinema</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/early-cinema/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/early-cinema/</guid><description>&lt;p>Early cinema matters here because it preserves possibilities that later narrative film partly disciplines. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/translation/attraction/">The Cinema of Attractions&lt;/a> is central because it treats early film not as an immature stage on the way to classical storytelling but as a different arrangement of film and viewer, built around exhibition, sensation, and direct address. Read next to &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/metz/">On Christian Metz&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/filmstudies/">Everything You Want to Know About Film Studies&lt;/a>, it becomes a historical counterweight to later assumptions about immersion and narrative coherence.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>That is what keeps early cinema alive across the site. It reopens questions about spectatorship and formal experimentation, and it reminds the reader that many things now treated as “natural” features of cinema were once only one option among several.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Memory</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/memory/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/memory/</guid><description>&lt;p>Memory matters here not simply as a theme inside stories, but as a formal principle. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/mirror/">Notes on The Mirror&lt;/a> is central because memory there is not an object to be discussed from the outside; it shapes the film’s very composition. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/dissertation/">The World Heard&lt;/a> extends that intuition into theory by showing how sound and cinematic world-building make recollection feel inhabitable rather than merely narrated.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Read alongside &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/mysterious/">In Praise of Mysterious Characters&lt;/a>, memory becomes inseparable from opacity, atmosphere, and felt duration. The important question is less what a character remembers than how a film makes remembering itself perceptible.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Perception</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/perception/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/perception/</guid><description>&lt;p>Perception ties together a large part of the cinema writing because the site treats film not primarily as information or story but as organized sensation. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/framing/">Three Lessons on Cinematic Framing&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/camera/">The Mysterious Craft of Camera Movement&lt;/a>, and &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/dissertation/">The World Heard&lt;/a> all work from the same premise: form matters because it changes how viewers see, hear, infer, and orient themselves.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>A frame can destabilize, a camera move can produce inferred bodily motion, and sound can deepen a world beyond what is visibly present. Read together, these essays suggest that cinematic meaning often begins as perceptual organization before it hardens into interpretation.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Writing and AI</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/writing-and-ai/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/writing-and-ai/</guid><description>&lt;p>These pages ask what happens when writing is no longer imagined as a solitary linear act. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/writing/writing-stages/">The Work of Writing in the Age of AI&lt;/a> proposes that AI changes the stages of composition itself, while &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/mindcraft/">Mindcraft&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/tabwriting/">Tabwriting and the Future of Writing Technology&lt;/a> push the argument into interface design: if thinking is now more collaborative, provisional, and dialogic, then writing tools should reflect that.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>What emerges is not just a story about efficiency. These essays suggest that AI changes both the practice and the software form of writing, making composition more conversational, more iterative, and more obviously shaped by the environments in which thought gets organized.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>AI Coding Tools</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/ai-coding-tools/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/ai-coding-tools/</guid><description>&lt;p>These essays argue that AI coding tools are not just better autocomplete. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/cli/">Claude Code and The Rise of CLI&lt;/a> explains why the terminal became such a natural environment for agents: text commands, composable tools, and file-based workflows are already machine-legible. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/skills/">Claude Skills, Commands, Agents toward a Unified Mission&lt;/a> adds the next layer by showing how reusable instructions and tool invocation begin to act like software components rather than one-off prompts.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Taken together with &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/software/">How We Build Software in the Age of AI&lt;/a>, the point becomes broader than programming. Coding tools are where the new interface model becomes easiest to see in public: software built for agents, with CLIs, skills, and harnesses, rather than software that assumes a human clicking through a GUI.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Agentic AI</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/agentic-ai/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/agentic-ai/</guid><description>&lt;p>The essays collected here treat agentic AI less as a mysterious property of a model than as a new software form. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/cowork/">Claude Cowork&lt;/a> makes the shift visible because the system does not merely answer prompts; it plans, executes, and loops through work. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/cc-vs-cowork/">The Fork in the Road: Claude Code vs CoWork&lt;/a> sharpens the point by showing that architecture, permissions, and resumability shape what an agent can become just as much as raw intelligence does.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Read alongside &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/harness/">Prompt, Context, Harness&lt;/a>, the larger argument is that agents force software to be rethought around execution and coordination. The important question is no longer whether an AI can produce a strong answer in one turn, but whether a system can stay coherent across tools, sub-agents, permissions, and changing state.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Voice Technology</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/voice-technology/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/voice-technology/</guid><description>&lt;p>Voice technology becomes more interesting on this site when it is not reduced to a benchmark table. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/voice/">From Turks to HAL&lt;/a> places synthetic voice inside a much longer history of mechanical speech and cultural fantasy, so that &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/tts/">The State of TTS&lt;/a> no longer reads as just a product survey. The question shifts from which model sounds best to what kinds of presence these systems make possible.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>That is why &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/aicompanion/">AI Companionship on the Rise&lt;/a> belongs in the same cluster. Once synthetic voice becomes convincing, its importance may be emotional and social before it is purely functional.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Technologies of Learning</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/technologies-of-learning/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/technologies-of-learning/</guid><description>&lt;p>The essays collected here ask a harder question than which platform works best. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/technology/techlearning/">Technologies of Learning, a 2024 Primer&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/pedagogy/elearning-demy/">Elearning Demystified&lt;/a>, and &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/pedagogy/slide/">The Format of the Century&lt;/a> all treat educational tools as media forms with assumptions built into them. Slides, online courses, and AI explainers are never just containers; each encodes a theory of what learning is supposed to be.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Read next to &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/pedagogy/702010/">Why E-Learning Fails the 70-20-10 Test&lt;/a>, the argument becomes sharper. The problem is not technology itself but the way educational systems overinvest in delivery and underinvest in participation, challenge, and feedback.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Programming Education</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/programming-education/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/programming-education/</guid><description>&lt;p>Programming education matters here because it sits at the intersection of computers, childhood, and educational design. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/pedagogy/papert/">Seymour Papert’s Legacy&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/translation/mindstorms/">Mindstorms&lt;/a> make the strongest case that programming should be introduced as a medium for thinking and making, not as a sterile ladder of beginner syntax. The learner needs powerful ideas and environments that reward experimentation.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>That makes &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/pedagogy/702010/">Why E-Learning Fails the 70-20-10 Test&lt;/a> more than a critique of training culture. It also becomes a reminder that code is learned through meaningful struggle, feedback, and projects that matter to the learner.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Translation</title><link>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/translation/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dliangthinks.me/atlas/topics/translation/</guid><description>&lt;p>Translation is not a side activity here. It is one of the ways the site expands its intellectual range, bringing film theory, educational thought, and literary work into relation with a different readership. &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/translation/attraction/">The Cinema of Attractions&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/translation/defense/">In Defense of Liberal Education&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/translation/mindstorms/">Mindstorms&lt;/a>, and &lt;a href="https://dliangthinks.me/translation/walden/">Walden&lt;/a> may look heterogeneous, but together they reveal the site’s persistent concerns: cinema, learning, media, and foundational texts that keep shaping how those questions are asked.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Seen this way, translation becomes a form of curation as much as linguistic transfer. It extends the site by importing lineages, not just by adding titles to a list.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>